Thumbnail Image

Evaluation of FAO’s contribution to the Guyana. Management response

sep/16

Year of publication 2016

Place of publication Rome, Italy ;

Pages 8p.

Publisher FAO ;

Category Evaluation report

Series title Country Programme Evaluation Series

Edition 1

Synopsis (short abstract) The evaluation which covered FAO’s cooperation in Guyana from 2012 to 2015 was very timely. The evaluation although in a limited way (due to the late submission of the report), provided very useful inputs which helped to orient the new CPF 2016-2019, making the CPF more aligned and relevant to the Government and other stakeholder priorities. Moreover, the discussions conducted during the evaluation emphasized the need to promote ownership of the CPF development process, and the involvement of na tional partners (government entities, civil society organization and the private sector).

Language English

Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Evaluation report
    Evaluation of FAO’s Contribution in Guyana 2016
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    The Country Programme Evaluation of FAO’s contribution in Guyana was conducted in 2015 with the main aim of informing the development of the new CPF cycle starting in 2016. It is intended that this exercise will provide inputs to better orient FAO’s programme in the next biennium, making it more relevant to the government priorities for the country. The evaluation was also intended to assess the strategic relevance in the national context of FAO’s programmes and interventions in Guyana.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Evaluation report
    Mid-term evaluation of the project “Mainstreaming sustainable land development and management”
    GCP/GUY/003/GRI
    2022
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    The mid-term evaluation of the project "Mainstreaming sustainable land development and management” was executed by the Guyana Land Survey Commission (GLSC), implemented by FAO and funded by the Guyana Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) Investment Fund (GRIF). Overall project effectiveness and efficiency is low: implementation is slow and few outputs and outcomes have been achieved. The main reasons are the poor communication and collaboration between GLSC and FAO, and insufficient delivery of their roles and responsibilities. Recently, improved communication between GLSC and FAO has generated better collaboration. The evaluation made a series of recommendations to improve project delivery during the remainder of the implementation period.
  • Thumbnail Image
Show more

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.