Thumbnail Image

Evaluation of FAO’s resilience sub-programme in Somalia 2013 - 2014

Resilience programme evaluation series

Year of publication 2015

Place of publication Rome, Italy ;

Pages 83 p.

Publisher FAO ;

Category Evaluation report

Series title Resilience programme evaluation series

Edition 1

Synopsis (short abstract) The Office of Evaluation (OED) of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) conducted an evaluation of the first two years of the FAO Somalia Resilience Sub-programme (2013-2014) in order to analyse the programme’s relevance and assess the progress made towards building resilience in Somalia. This evaluation also focuses on the application of the programme approach in FAO, and the added value of working under a joint strategy with other UN agencies in the context of Somal ia. The evaluation will provide accountability to donors and Government, while serving as a learning exercise for the organization and offering guidance to the resilience programme.

Language English

Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Evaluation report
  • Thumbnail Image
    Evaluation report
  • Thumbnail Image
    Evaluation report
    Evaluation of the project “Food and Nutrition Security Resilience Programme: Building food system resilience in protracted crises”
    Project code: GCP/GLO/997/NET
    2024
    Also available in:
    No results found.
    The FAO's "Food and Nutrition Security Resilience Programme (FNS-REPRO)" aimed to build food system resilience in crisis-affected areas of Sudan (Darfur), Somaliland, and South Sudan from 2019 to 2024, with a budget of USD 28 million. This evaluation assessed the program's relevance, approach, and impact on rural food security, nutrition, and resilience. Using mixed methods, including over 100 interviews, 20 focus group discussions, and field visits, the evaluation revealed FNS-REPRO's innovative approach to addressing conflict and food insecurity by upgrading food systems along value chains. Despite its novel design, the program lacked coherence between components, such as integrating nutrition capacity-building with agricultural value chains. Significant improvements were noted in agricultural income, natural resource management, conflict management, and women's engagement. However, the absence of local private sector partnerships posed a sustainability risk. The evaluation provided eight recommendations to enhance future programs, emphasizing comprehensive value chain support, local partnerships, peacebuilding funding, and community-based monitoring.
Show more

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.